AS/NZS 1891, the fall-arrest standard, recently retitled

AS/NZS 1891 is a multi-part standard series covering personal fall-arrest equipment — harnesses, lanyards, connectors and anchor and lifeline systems. The interesting recent development is not a technical one we can discuss: Part 4 was substantially revised in November 2025 and renamed, and the new name signals a real shift in scope.

Last updated 2026-08-24

What the series covers

In our own words: this series covers personal fall-protection equipment for work at height — harnesses, lanyards, connectors, anchors, fall-arrest devices and horizontal lifeline and rail systems, including, in Part 4, how to select, use and maintain that equipment. It is the standard behind the harness clipped to the fixed ladders and platforms it is often used alongside, as distinct from the fixed structure itself.

The retitle worth reporting

We confirmed directly, from a Standards Australia blog post announcing the edition, that AS/NZS 1891.4:2025 was published on 10 November 2025, developed by committee SF-015.

What is genuinely worth publishing here is the name change. The series has long been called "Industrial fall-arrest systems and devices." Part 4, in this new edition, has been retitled "Personal Equipment for Work at Height, Part 4: Selection, Use and Maintenance." That is a scope-and-branding shift within the standard’s own numbering family, not a content detail we are reproducing — it is simply the fact that the part’s name changed, confirmed directly by the publisher’s own announcement.

The regulator citation, likely but unverified

A Safe Work Australia model Code of Practice on managing the risk of falls at workplaces plausibly references the AS/NZS 1891 series — that would be an unsurprising thing for such a document to do. We were not able to retrieve that document directly and confirm a citing sentence ourselves in this round of research, so we are reporting this the same way as elsewhere in this reference: a citation we rate as likely, not as confirmed.

We tried a second route as well — a mirrored copy of an earlier edition of the same Code of Practice, hosted elsewhere and readable directly. It did not contain a confirmable citing sentence in the portions we could extract, which is not the same as confirming the series is absent from the document, only that our attempt to find the sentence did not succeed.

Where fall arrest fits around racking

Fall-arrest equipment matters wherever working at height near racking is genuinely unavoidable — high picking levels, elevated maintenance access. Edge protection, the fixed alternative to wearing a harness, is a different control entirely, and the two are not interchangeable: one is a barrier that removes the fall risk, the other manages a fall that has already started. The same equipment question comes up around inspecting racking from an elevated position, where whoever does the looking has to get up there safely first.

Common questions

What changed in the November 2025 edition of AS/NZS 1891.4?
It was retitled from "Industrial fall-arrest systems and devices, Part 4" to "Personal Equipment for Work at Height, Part 4: Selection, Use and Maintenance", confirmed by a Standards Australia announcement dated 10 November 2025. We are reporting the name change, not the technical content behind it.
Does a regulator cite AS/NZS 1891?
Likely, based on the existence of relevant Safe Work Australia guidance on falls, but we were not able to confirm a verbatim citation ourselves in this round of research. Treat it as plausible, not established.
Is a harness a substitute for fixed edge protection?
No, they are different types of control. Edge protection is a barrier that removes the fall risk at the source. A harness manages a fall that has already begun. Neither claim on this page states that either one, on its own, makes a site safe.
Does the name change affect equipment bought under the old title?
That is a technical question the standard itself would need to answer, and we have not verified it. What we can confirm is that the part’s title has changed in the new edition, which is worth knowing if you are reading older material written against the previous name.

Sources

Read next